The water quality of rivers a context to explore argumentative competence in high school students

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Dec 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46667/renbio.v15i2.719
Keywords:
Argumentation, Data Usage, Second hand data, Water quality, Environmental education

Main Article Content

Linda Dayana Ramírez Acosta
Universidad del Valle
Tatiana Iveth Salazar-López
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the Industrial Polytechnic Institute

Abstract

We present the analysis of the written productions of high school students when interacting with an argumentative context about the pollution of rivers. The information was analyzed in a category system composed of 8 dimensions. The results indicate that the dimensions data sources and relationship of variables present barriers that are due to the reading and interpretation of charts and graphs. Regarding the Incorporation of data dimension when elaborating an argument, the students appeal to the stories of the surrounding inhabitants as evidence in comparison to the use of data associated with numerical values. It is necessary to previously work on other skills such as the interpretation and use of data to achieve the construction of more robust arguments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramírez Acosta, L. . D., & Salazar-López , T. I. . (2022). The water quality of rivers: a context to explore argumentative competence in high school students. SBEnBio Biology Teaching Journal, 15(2), 925–949. https://doi.org/10.46667/renbio.v15i2.719
Issue
2022: v.15, 2 (dez. 2022)
Section
Relatos de Experiência
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Aviso de Direito Autoral Creative Commons

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

    1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
    2. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
    3. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
Author Biographies

Linda Dayana Ramírez Acosta, Universidad del Valle

Degree in Basic Education with Emphasis in Natural Sciences and Environmental Education - Universidad del Valle - Colombia. Teacher of natural sciences in secondary basic education - Colegio CREAD - Colombia.

Tatiana Iveth Salazar-López , Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the Industrial Polytechnic Institute

PhD in Education for Science - "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" State University (UNESP) Bauru, SP - Brazil. Research professor at the Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the Industrial Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV) Unit Monterrey, Mexico

References

BARDIN, Laurence. Análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal, 1991.

CAMPANER, Gertrudis; DE LONGHI, Ana Lía. La argumentación en educación ambiental. Una estrategia didáctica para la escuela media. Revista electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Vigo, v. 6, n. 2, 2007. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2471036 Acceso en: 12 Dic 2021

CHAZATAR, Sofía; GIRALDO, Estefanía; SÁNCHEZ, Sarah. Cali entre ríos: reconstrucción de memoria en torno a las relaciones entre la comunidad caleña y los siete ríos de la ciudad. 2019. 139 f. Tesis (Pregrado en Comunicación Social). Programa de Comunicación Social, Universidad del Valle, 2019.

DUSCHL, Richard. Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. En: ERDURAN, Sibel; JIMÉNEZ-ALEIXANDRE, María (Ed.). Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. p. 159-175.

GONZÁLEZ, Alba; PUIG, Blanca. Analizar una problemática ambiental local para practicar la argumentación en clase de ciencias. Revista electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Vigo, v. 16, n. 2, 2017. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10347/15841 Acceso en: 12 Dic 2021

GONZÁLEZ, Jennifer; SÁNCHEZ, Liliana; GARCÍA, Álvaro. La argumentación como vía para la mejora del aprendizaje de las ciencias. Un estudio desde las problemáticas ambientales. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, Barcelona, n. Extra, p. 1607-1611, 2013.

GROOMS, Jonathon; SAMPSON, Victor; ENDERLE, Patrick. How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 55, n. 9, p. 1264-1286, 2018.

HUG, Barbara; MCNEILL, Katherine. Use of first‐hand and second‐hand data in science: Does data type influence classroom conversations? International Journal of Science Education, v. 30, n. 13, p. 1725-1751, 2008.

JIMÉNEZ, Aleixandre. 10 ideas clave. Competencias en argumentación y uso de pruebas. Barcelona: Graó, 2010.

KELLY, Gregory; REGEV, Jacqueline; PROTHERO, William. Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation. En: ERDURAN, Sibel; JIMÉNEZ-ALEIXANDRE, María (Ed.). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-Based Research. Dordre-cht: Springer, 2008. p. 137-158.

MANZ, Eve. Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, v. 85, n. 4, p. 553-590, 2015.

MESA, Sandra; SEÑA, Erika. Argumentación en torno al concepto" lo vivo": discusiones sobre el maltrato animal como asunto sociocientífico. 2013. 166 f. Disertación (Maestría en Educación) Programa de Posgrado en Educación, Universidad de Antioquia, 2013.

MILES, Matthew; HUBERMAN, A. Michael. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2. ed. New Delhi: Sage, 1994.

OSBORNE, Jonathan, et al. The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of research in science teaching, v. 53, n. 6, p. 821-846, 2016.

QUILLIN, Kim; THOMAS, Stephen. Drawing-to-learn: a framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2015.

REVEL, Andrea; DÍAZ, Carlos; ADÚRIZ-BRAVO, Agustín. Argumentación científica escolar y su contribución al aprendizaje del tema «salud y enfermedad». Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, Cádiz, v.3, n. 18, Sept./Feb. 2021. Disponible en: 10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i3.3101 Acceso: 20 Dic 2021.

SANMARTÍ, Neus; IZQUIERDO, Mercč; GARCÍA, Pilar. Hablar y escribir: Una condición necesaria para aprender ciencias. Cuadernos de pedagogía, España, v. 281, p. 0054-58, 1999.

SANMARTÍ, Neus. Didáctica de las ciencias en la educación secundaria obligatoria. Madrid: Síntesis S.A. 2009.

TAMAYO, Oscar. La argumentación como constituyente del pensamiento crítico en niños. Hallazgos, Cali, v. 9, n. 17, p. 211-233, 2012.

TOULMIN, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. 2. ed. Cambridge: University Press. 1958.