Correlation and causation in inquiry-based teaching Biology classes

Main Article Content

Beatriz Busin Campos
Maíra Batistoni e Silva

Abstract

Correlation and causation are important concepts for the understanding of scientific knowledge, however they are commonly mistaken. We developed and applied a teaching sequence (TS) to investigate how high school students relate different variables in data analysis and to evaluate how a TS that discusses correlation and causation helps in the construction of evidence-based explanations. The investigative TS developed addressed the intestinal microbiota and, during its application, we found out that students usually infer causation through data that demonstrate correlations, often using prior knowledge to justify such inferences. We also consider that as the TS was applied remotely the interaction between peers, fundamental in the investigative approach, was not effective, explaining students' difficulty in recognizing and overcoming their mistakes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Campos, B. B., & Silva, M. B. e. (2023). Correlation and causation in inquiry-based teaching Biology classes. SBEnBio Biology Teaching Journal, 16(1), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.46667/renbio.v16i1.904
Section
Artigos com Relatos de Pesquisa
Author Biographies

Beatriz Busin Campos, University of Sao Paulo

Estudiante de maestría en el Programa Interunitario de Posgrado en Enseñanza de Ciencias - Universidad de São Paulo (USP) São Paulo, SP - Brasil. Profesor de ciencias - Oso Arce Alto de Pinheiros. Sao Paulo, SP - Brasil

Maíra Batistoni e Silva, University of São Paulo

PhD in Education - University of São Paulo (USP). Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil. Professor - University of São Paulo (USP). Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil.

References

ALLCHIN, Douglas. Teaching the nature of science: perspectives & resources. St. Paul, MN: SHiPS Education Press, 2013.

BARROWMAN, Nick. Correlation, causation, and confusion. The New Atlantis, p. 23-44, 2014.

BRAATEN, Melissa; WINDSCHITL, Mark. Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science education, v. 95, n. 4, p. 639-669, 2011.

CARVALHO, Anna Maria Pessoa de et al. O ensino de ciências e a proposição de sequências de ensino investigativas. Ensino de ciências por investigação: condições para implementação em sala de aula. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, v. 1, p. 1-19, 2013.

CECIMIG FaE UFMG. Conferência de encerramento. ENCONTRO DE ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS POR INVESTIGAÇÃO, 2., 2020. YouTube, 16/10/2020. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wiWwFw9upM. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2023

CHINN, Clark A.; MALHOTRA, Betina A. Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science education, v. 86, n. 2, p. 175-218, 2002.

CURRAN-EVERETT, Douglas. Explorations in statistics: power. Advances in Physiology Education, v. 34, n. 2, p. 41-43, 2010.

DEVROOP, Karendra. Correlation versus causation: another look at a common misinterpretation. 2000. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED445078

DUSCHL, Richard A.; GRANDY, Richard E. Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: framing the debates. Teaching scientific inquiry. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2008. p. 1-37.

EDITORIAL. In science we trust. Nature Medicine, v. 7, p. 871, 2001.

FALONY, Gwen et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, p. 560-564, 2016.

HALL, Kevin D. et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell metabolism, v. 30, n. 1, p. 67-77. e3, 2019.

KELLY, Gregory J.; LICONA, Peter. Epistemic practices and science education. History, philosophy and science teaching. Springer, Cham, p. 139-165, 2018.

KELLY, Gregory. Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. Teaching scientific inquiry. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, p. 99-117, 2008.

KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva, 2020.

KUHN, Deanna; RAMSEY, Stephanie; ARVIDSSON, Toi Sin. Developing multivariable thinkers. Cognitive Development, v. 35, p. 92-110, 2015.

LONGINO, Helen E. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.

MCCAIN, Kevin. Explanation and the nature of scientific knowledge. Science & Education, v. 24, n. 7, p. 827-854, 2015.

MICHAEL, Joel. What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. Advances in physiology education, v. 31, n. 1, p. 34-40, 2007.

MINNER, Daphne D.; LEVY, Abigail Jurist; CENTURY, Jeanne. Inquiry‐based science instruction - what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, v. 47, n. 4, p. 474-496, 2010.

MORAES, Roque; GALIAZZI, Maria do Carmo. Análise textual discursiva: processo constitutivo de múltiplas faces. Ciência & Educação. Bauru, v.12, n.1, p. 117-128, 2006.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

NORRIS, Stephen P. et al. A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, v. 89, n. 4, p. 535-563, 2005.

OSBORNE, Jonathan. Defining a Knowledge Base for Reasoning in Science: the role of procedural and epistemic knowledge. Reconceptualizing STEM Education. Routledge, p. 229-245, 2016.

PEDASTE, Margus et al. Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, v. 14, p. 47-61, 2015.

SCARPA, Daniela Lopes; CAMPOS, Natália Ferreira. Potencialidades do ensino de Biologia por Investigação. Estudos avançados, v. 32, p. 25-41, 2018.

SLOMINSKI, Tara; GRINDBERG, Sarah; MOMSEN, Jennifer. Physiology is hard: a replication study of students’ perceived learning difficulties. Advances in physiology education, v. 43, n. 2, p. 121-127, 2019.

STREVENS, Michael. No understanding without explanation. Studies in history and philosophy of science Part A, v. 44, n. 3, p. 510-515, 2013.

ZORZETTO, Ricardo. Alguns efeitos dos alimentos fabricados. Revista Pesquisa FAPESP, São Paulo, n. 265, p. 21-27, 2018.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)